Re: Issues with Quorum Commit - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Issues with Quorum Commit
Date
Msg-id 1286374847.2304.101.camel@ebony
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Issues with Quorum Commit  (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: Issues with Quorum Commit
Re: Issues with Quorum Commit
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 15:26 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:

> You're not going to get zero data loss that way.

Ending the wait state does not cause data loss. It puts you at *risk* of
data loss, which is a different thing entirely.

If you want to avoid data loss you use N+k redundancy and get on with
life, rather than sitting around waiting.

Putting in a feature for people that choose k=0 seems wasteful to me,
since they knowingly put themselves at risk in the first place.

-- Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: host name support in pg_hba.conf
Next
From: Dimitri Fontaine
Date:
Subject: Re: Issues with Quorum Commit