Re: standby registration (was: is sync rep stalled?) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: standby registration (was: is sync rep stalled?)
Date
Msg-id 1286290011.2025.1465.camel@ebony
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: standby registration (was: is sync rep stalled?)  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: standby registration (was: is sync rep stalled?)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 10:41 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> >>
> >> When you have one server functioning at each site you'll block until
> >> you get a third machine back, rather than replicating to both sites
> >> and remaining functional.
> >
> > And that is so important a consideration that you would like to move
> > from one parameter in one file to a whole set of parameters, set
> > differently in 5 separate files?
> 
> I don't accept that this is the trade-off being proposed.  You seem
> convinced that having the config all in one place on the master is
> going to make things much more complicated, but I can't see why.

But it is not "all in one place" because the file needs to be different
on 5 separate nodes. Which *does* make it more complicated than the
alternative is a single parameter, set the same everywhere.

-- Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: patch: SQL/MED(FDW) DDL
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: patch: SQL/MED(FDW) DDL