Hi,
On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 19:27 -0600, mark wrote:
> I downloaded the srpm and used that to make a rpm for our own internal
> use, the odd thing was a lot of the pathing from the spec file seemed
> to use directory paths that was, I thought, only used in beta roll
> outs.
> e.g. a lot of the pathing was /usr/pgsql-9.0/ (when I thought final
> releases were always without the version number in the dir name)
>
> can someone who knows what they are doing just take a quick look and
> see if I am wrong or if maybe something was missed when 9.0 went
> final?
Please see this blog post:
http://people.planetpostgresql.org/devrim/index.php?/archives/48-What-is-new-in-PostgreSQL-9.0-RPMs.html
It explains why we did not change $PATH, which binaries are under $PATH,
and other stuff.
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
PostgreSQL RPM Repository: http://yum.pgrpms.org
Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.gunduz.org Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz
