Re: Re: [GENERAL] +/- Inf for float8's - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Re: [GENERAL] +/- Inf for float8's
Date
Msg-id 12810.991714862@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: [GENERAL] +/- Inf for float8's  (Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@fourpalms.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@fourpalms.org> writes:
> On a modestly related note, I'm come over to the notion that the
> date/time value 'current' could be ripped out eventually. Tom, isn't
> that the only case for those types which bolluxes up caching of
> date/time types?

Yes, I believe so.  At least, that was the consideration that led me
to mark those functions noncachable ...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephan Szabo
Date:
Subject: Re: Question about inheritance
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Mirrors not tracking main ftp site?