Re: bitmap indexes - performance - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: bitmap indexes - performance
Date
Msg-id 1279796069.1795.54.camel@ebony
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: bitmap indexes - performance  (Leonardo F <m_lists@yahoo.it>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 16:30 +0000, Leonardo F wrote:

> To sum up: IMHO nor improvements in memory usage nor 
> in startup time would be good reasons to switch to bitmap
> indexes... but bulk index creation time (10 minutes to index
> what it takes 60 minutes with btree... and maybe more if tables
> are bigger) and (maybe) index disk space might be...
> but I'm not 100% convinced...

Are you intending to work on this for 9.1? 

-- Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: security label support, part.2
Next
From: vamsi krishna
Date:
Subject: Copy path in Dynamic programming