On Wed, 2010-05-12 at 09:37 -0700, David Fetter wrote:
> On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 07:33:53PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > The server's messages and the documentation uses all of these terms in
> > mixed ways. Maybe we could decide on some preferred terminology and
> > adjust the existing texts. Ideas?
>
> How about origin/subscriber? More descriptive than primary/secondary,
> and less tied to a particular model of interaction.
Yes but completely out of scope within the market. Master/Slave or
Master/Standby is probably where it needs to be.
Joshua D. Drake
--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 503.667.4564
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
