Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance
Date
Msg-id 1272404753.4161.8355.camel@ebony
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 17:24 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:

> Isn't the snapshotOldestActiveXid filter in
> RecordKnownAssignedTransactionIds completely wrong/useless/bogus?
> 
> AFAICS, snapshotOldestActiveXid is only set once at the start of
> recovery.  This means it will soon be too old to provide any useful
> filtering.  But what's far worse is that the XID space will eventually
> wrap around, and that test will start filtering *everything*.
> 
> I think we should just lose that test, as well as the variable.

Yes, though it looks like it is still necessary in creating a valid
initial state because otherwise we may have xids in KnownAssigned array
that are already complete. The comment there talks about wasting memory,
though it appears to be a correctness issue.

So perhaps a similar test is required in ProcArrayApplyRecoveryInfo()
but not in RecordKnownAssignedTransactionIds(). That way it is applied,
but only once at initialisation.

-- Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: recovery_connections cannot start