Re: Air-traffic benchmark - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Air-traffic benchmark
Date
Msg-id 1265280073.4660.157.camel@ebony
Whole thread Raw
In response to Air-traffic benchmark  (Lefteris <lsidir@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-performance
On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 13:38 +0100, Lefteris wrote:
> Reported query times are (in sec):
> MonetDB 7.9s
> InfoBright 12.13s
> LucidDB 54.8s

It needs to be pointed out that those databases are specifically
optimised for Data Warehousing, whereas Postgres core is optimised for
concurrent write workloads in production systems.

If you want a best-vs-best type of comparison, you should be looking at
a version of Postgres optimised for Data Warehousing. These results show
that Postgres-related options exist that clearly beat the above numbers.
http://community.greenplum.com/showthread.php?t=111
I note also that Greenplum's Single Node Edition is now free to use, so
is a reasonable product for comparison on this list.

Also, I'm unimpressed by a Data Warehouse database that requires
everything to reside in memory, e.g. MonetDB. That severely limits
real-world usability, in my experience because it implies the queries
you're running aren't ad-hoc.

--
 Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Amitabh Kant
Date:
Subject: Re: Optimizing Postgresql server and FreeBSD for heavy read and writes
Next
From: Matthew Wakeling
Date:
Subject: Re: Optimizing Postgresql server and FreeBSD for heavy read and writes