Re: commit fests (was Re: primary key error message) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: commit fests (was Re: primary key error message)
Date
Msg-id 1264167658.14009.2.camel@fsopti579.F-Secure.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: commit fests (was Re: primary key error message)  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: commit fests (was Re: primary key error message)  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Re: commit fests (was Re: primary key error message)  (Bernd Helmle <mailings@oopsware.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On tor, 2010-01-21 at 18:05 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Well, we used to have the idea of a feature freeze ... is that going
> to apply at the end of the commitfest?

Feature freeze was used to discourage the submission of very big patches
shortly before beta.  The commit fest process has IMO alleviated this
concern.  Beta is still the definite cutoff; and the closer we get to
beta, the smaller the acceptable changes become.  I think that formula
basically applies throughout the entire cycle.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tim Bunce
Date:
Subject: Re: warn in plperl logs as... NOTICE??
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: commit fests (was Re: primary key error message)