Re: why partition pruning doesn't work? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: why partition pruning doesn't work?
Date
Msg-id 12624.1528578026@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: why partition pruning doesn't work?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: why partition pruning doesn't work?
List pgsql-hackers
I wrote:
> One thing I'm wondering about is why in the world are PartitionPruneInfo
> and its subsidiary struct types declared in primnodes.h?

Oh, and while I'm bitching: it seems like there is hardly any part of
the partitioning code in which the comments aren't desperately in need
of a copy-editing pass.  They are just chock-full of misspellings,
grammar that is faulty enough to make the meaning unclear, and/or
errors of fact.  An example of the latter is the repeated claims that
the basic partitioning functions belong to the planner.  Maybe that
was true at some stage of development; but AFAICS the logic in question
now lives in src/backend/partitioning/, which I would not think is
part of the planner.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Jonathan S. Katz"
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres 11 release notes
Next
From: Marina Polyakova
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] WIP Patch: Pgbench Serialization and deadlock errors