On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 10:24 -0500, Emmanuel Cecchet wrote:
> But it looks like it is a waste of everybody's time to continue this
> discussion further. Just move the patch to the rejected patches and
> let's wait for Itagaki's implementation.
Emmanuel, please try to work together with Itagaki san on getting the
bigger vision implemented, as this is a thing that can benefit a lot
from more people who have taken the time to learn about the parts of
code involved.
Even though this patch will not get in, most of the effort in developing
it is not actual coding, but familiarizing yourself with the other code
involved.
Coding actual patches should be easy once you know the code _and_ the
desired result.
You probably already know a lot of what is required to help us to common
goal of a clean implementation of partitioning.
> --
> Emmanuel Cecchet
> Aster Data
> Web: http://www.asterdata.com
>
>
--
Hannu Krosing http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Scalability and Availability Services, Consulting and Training
