Re: operator exclusion constraints - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jeff Davis
Subject Re: operator exclusion constraints
Date
Msg-id 1257619593.27737.583.camel@jdavis
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: operator exclusion constraints  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 2009-11-06 at 21:20 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > bison -v doesn't show anything useful beyond saying that there is one
> > shift/reduce conflict. The gram.output is 10MB, which doesn't help me
> > much (I'm still trying to make sense of it).
>
> Well, you need to learn a bit more about bison I think.

Yes, I do. Thank you very much for the detailed explanation; it was very
informative.

I have made the suggested changes, and now it works easily with
EXCLUSION, EXCLUDING, EXCLUSIVE, or EXCLUDE. I have also merged with the
latest changes, and I did another cleanup pass on the patch.

Regards,
    Jeff Davis

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Uninitialized Data in WAL records generated in heap_(insert|update|delete)
Next
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: operator exclusion constraints