Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types
Date
Msg-id 1252496667.15729.6.camel@fsopti579.F-Secure.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types  ("David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>)
Responses Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 10:23 -0700, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> On Sep 8, 2009, at 10:15 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> 
> >>     arg_a IS DISTINCT FROM arg_b
> >
> > Surely you'd want arg_a and arg_b constrained to the same type,
> > otherwise there is no certainty that that means anything at all.
> 
> Yes, for the purposes of pgTAP perhaps so. Then it's on the user to do  
> the cast, because she decides that the cast is appropriate. Otherwise,  
> as I said, perhaps it'd be too magical.

That's beginning to sound a bit like a generics feature.  E.g.,

CREATE FUNCTION the_same<T>(arg_a T, arg_b T) RETURNS bool AS $$
SELECT arg_a IS DISTINCT FROM arg_b;
$$;



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Teodor Sigaev
Date:
Subject: Re: Gothic moth fails on Tsearch2 contrib module check (PG8.2)
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: suggestion to improve planer