On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 11:41 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Joshua D. Drake<jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 07:44 +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >> On ons, 2009-09-02 at 12:52 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >> > Isn't "core" supposed to be the release manager?
> >>
> >> The core team has historically been the release *maker* and has some
> >> done management of the final phases of that process. But I think the
> >> sentiment is growing that we need more management throughout the entire
> >> release cycle.
> >
> > O.k. so a "release" team. Cool. I am assuming the team would be more
> > directed toward upcoming major release versus minor releases to past
> > revisions. We already pretty much have that under control between -core
> > and -packagers. Yes?
>
> +1.
O.k. so the second part of this, is I feel it should contain a majority
of people who are not already being slammed into the ground by community
work. E.g; let's get some fresh blood. It is certainly important to have
a couple of long standing contributors involved but we have some people
that have cropped up recently (relatively) within our community that
could probably be overworked a bit more ;)
Joshua D. Drake
/me pokes Robert Haas and Kevin Grittner
>
> ...Robert
>
--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 503.667.4564
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
