Re: For production: 8.4 or 8.3? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Subject Re: For production: 8.4 or 8.3?
Date
Msg-id 1248767546.27116.23.camel@hp-laptop2.gunduz.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: For production: 8.4 or 8.3?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: For production: 8.4 or 8.3?
Re: For production: 8.4 or 8.3?
List pgsql-general
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 19:44 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > I thought they would get around to changing it now.
>
> "They" is me, and it's not changing.  I'm not blowing a chance at
> in-place upgrade to switch the integer-timestamp default.

FWIW, to follow PostgreSQL defaults, I changed PGDG rpms to use it by
default. I think this will be the first time that we break compatibility
between RH RPMs and PGDG ones.

It is your playground, but *IMHO* you should not disable a switch that
is on by PostgreSQL's default.

Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ, RHCE
Command Prompt - http://www.CommandPrompt.com
devrim~gunduz.org, devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
                   http://www.gunduz.org

Attachment

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "A. Kretschmer"
Date:
Subject: Re: Join tables by nearest date?
Next
From: Phoenix Kiula
Date:
Subject: Re: For production: 8.4 or 8.3?