On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 14:14 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> pg_standby is useful and needs to be correct.
My suggestion was designed to provide this. A misunderstanding.
> And its existence as a
> standard module is one of the things that has made me feel confident
> about recommending people to use the PITR stuff. I'll be very annoyed if
> it were to get pulled.
If we cannot make it correct within core, then I will make it correct
somewhere else, beta or not. Other than that, I have no wish to remove
it from contrib.
-- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
