Re: Patch to fix search_path defencies with pg_bench - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Patch to fix search_path defencies with pg_bench
Date
Msg-id 1241710172.6109.235.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Patch to fix search_path defencies with pg_bench  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Patch to fix search_path defencies with pg_bench  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 11:14 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:

> > We should check they are the correct tables before we just drop them.
> > Perhaps check for the comment "Tables for pgbench application. Not
> > production data" on the tables, which would be nice to add anyway.
> 
> I bet it would be just as good and a lot simpler to do what someone
> suggested upthread, namely s/^/pgbench_/

Running pgbench has become more popular now, with various people
recommending running it on every system to test performance. I don't
disagree with that recommendation, but I've had problems myself with a
similar issue - hence earlier patch to prevent pgbench running a
complete database VACUUM before every test run.

-- Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Training, Services and Support



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: Serializable Isolation without blocking
Next
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: Serializable Isolation without blocking