Re: vacuumdb --freeze - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Zdenek Kotala
Subject Re: vacuumdb --freeze
Date
Msg-id 1235049602.1420.61.camel@localhost
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: vacuumdb --freeze  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: vacuumdb --freeze  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian píše v čt 19. 02. 2009 v 08:08 -0500:
> > you should use vacuum_freeze_min_age instead. On other side it
> breaks
> > vacuumdb backward compatibility which we did not declare, but it
> could
> > be fine.
> 
> How does adding a flag break backward compatibiity?
> 

I meant that vacuum_freeze_min_age was introduced in 8.2 and cannot be
used for older database. if you use it you cannot run vacuumdb freeze on
8.1 and older. See Peter's list of backward compatible applications.
    Zdenek



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Allow on/off as input texts for boolean.
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: vacuumdb --freeze