Re: an other provokative question?? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: an other provokative question??
Date
Msg-id 12333.1189144295@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: an other provokative question??  (Erik Jones <erik@myemma.com>)
List pgsql-general
Erik Jones <erik@myemma.com> writes:
> I'm curious, given that Postgres wasn't even an SQL-centric database
> when the original project ended, how much of the current Postgres
> code base still contains code from the original project before the
> incorporation of SQl rename to PostgreSQL?

You can still find a lot of code in the current CVS that has obvious
ancestry in Postgres v4r2.  I think there might not be too many lines
that have never been changed at all, but nobody who could read C would
have any problem detecting the relationship.

Elein might have more to say on the point... I'm just a newbie.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Ow Mun Heng
Date:
Subject: Re: dblink vs dbi-link (and errors compiling)
Next
From: Zoltan Boszormenyi
Date:
Subject: What's the difference between SET STORAGE MAIN and EXTENDED?