Re: Hot Standby dev build (v8) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Hot Standby dev build (v8)
Date
Msg-id 1232140505.31669.102.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Hot Standby dev build (v8)  (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: Hot Standby dev build (v8)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 22:09 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:

> >> RecentGlobalXmin is just a hint, it lags behind the real oldest xmin 
> >> that GetOldestXmin() would return. If another backend has a more recent 
> >> RecentGlobalXmin value, and has killed more recent tuples on the page, 
> >> the latestRemovedXid written here is too old.
> > 
> > What do you think we should do instead?
> 
> Dunno. Maybe call GetOldestXmin().

We are discussing btree deletes, not btree vacuums. If we are doing
btree delete then we have an unreleased snapshot therefore we also have
a non-zero xmin. How can another backend have a later RecentGlobalXmin
or result from GetOldestXmin() than we do?

-- Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Training, Services and Support



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: PL test fails on several animals
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch