Yura Sokolov <y.sokolov@postgrespro.ru> writes: > 2. I don't see why pg_prng_state could not be `typedef uint64 > pg_prng_state[2];` Please no. That sort of typedef behaves so weirdly that it's a foot-gun. regards, tom lane
pgsql-hackers by date:
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных