Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code
Date
Msg-id 1229031560.13078.170.camel@hp_dx2400_1
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code  ("Fujii Masao" <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 2008-12-11 at 19:19 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:

> My new design of archiving is as follows.

So far I haven't asked about running multiple standby servers and don't
recall having seen this mentioned anywhere. Forgive me if this was
already mentioned.

The idea is that we would be able to have multiple standby servers
connecting to one primary, yes? It would be useful to have sync
replication work that it must get an acknowledgement from at least one
standby before it continues.

Or do you think we would stream to just one standby, then use the
archiver (primary or standby) to keep sending files to allow multiple
additional standby nodes?

-- Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Training, Services and Support



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: benchmarking the query planner
Next
From: Gregory Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: posix_fadvise v22