Re: PostgreSQL + Replicator developer meeting 10/28 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Hannu Krosing
Subject Re: PostgreSQL + Replicator developer meeting 10/28
Date
Msg-id 1225216002.7694.20.camel@huvostro
Whole thread Raw
In response to PostgreSQL + Replicator developer meeting 10/28  (Joshua Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: PostgreSQL + Replicator developer meeting 10/28
Re: PostgreSQL + Replicator developer meeting 10/28
Re: PostgreSQL + Replicator developer meeting 10/28
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 13:42 -0700, Joshua Drake wrote:
> With the recent open sourcing of Replicator, the team has been trying
> to come up with ways to ensure an open development process. In that
> light we have decided to have our first release 1.9 meeting on
> Freenode. All people interested in participating in a discussion about
> the upcoming Replicator 1.9 are welcome to attend.

I missed the meeting at #replicator, but still have some questions
* Is there a mailing list for replicator ?

>  The current topics are:
>
>     * New MCP architecture

What's new ? 

I have some doubts about the current architecture based on my reading of
replicator wiki, but would like to learn about the "new" architecture
before spending too much time in studying the "old" one.

>     * DDL Replication

Is it there alread, or is it just  a planned feature ?

>     * Release timeline
>     * Questions
* How hard would it be to extract DDL replication part and use it as  basis for DDL after trigger support for use in
triggerbased  replication/auditing like Slony ann pgQ/Londiste ?
 
* special DDL triggers capturing DDL statement source could also     be an alternative to full DDL triggers.

> Replicator is set to be a short cycle release, hopefully landing before
> PostgreSQL 8.4. It will support PostgreSQL 8.3 and PostgreSQL 8.4 (when
> 8.4 is available). We will be meeting in the #replicator channel at
> 10:00 AM PDT...


--------------
Hannu




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Updating FSM on recovery
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Window Functions: v07 APIs and buffering strateties