Re: CLUSTER FREEZE - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: CLUSTER FREEZE
Date
Msg-id 12191.1382667580@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: CLUSTER FREEZE  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: CLUSTER FREEZE  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> I wonder if we should go so far as to make this the default behavior,
> instead of just making it an option.

In that case you'd have to invent a NOFREEZE keyword, no?  Ick.

In any case, it's very far from obvious to me that CLUSTER ought
to throw away information by default, which is what you're proposing.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Sawada Masahiko
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch for fail-back without fresh backup
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Move rmtree() from libpgport to libpgcommon