Re: Invocation overhead for procedural languages - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Ragnar
Subject Re: Invocation overhead for procedural languages
Date
Msg-id 1218061616.10575.5.camel@localhost.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Invocation overhead for procedural languages  (Giorgio Valoti <giorgio_v@mac.com>)
List pgsql-general
On mið, 2008-08-06 at 20:48 +0200, Giorgio Valoti wrote:
> On 06/ago/08, at 16:04, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>
> >
> > it's depend. Start of interpret is only one overhead.
> > Other is date
> > conversions to language compatible types (without C and plpgsql).

> So is plpgsql slower on date conversion than other languages? Just
> curious: why does shared evaluation add some overhead?
>

I am sure he meant "data" conversion , not "date"

gnari



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Chirag Dave
Date:
Subject: lossing pg_stat's data
Next
From: John DeSoi
Date:
Subject: Re: looking for psql without server-installation