On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 17:03 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> this is third variant with variadic argumen as scalar. But I still
> strongly prefer second variant with conformance declared variadic
> array with used array variable.
This version allows you to declare two functions "foo(variadic numeric)"
and "foo(numeric)", and then if you do a "\df foo" the backend crashes.
Also, you didn't update an error string:
"variadic argument isn't an array" should (in this version) be something
like: "can't find array type for variadic parameter type %s"
I suggest a slightly different wording for the following error messages:
"aggregate function has variadic argument" -> "variadic parameters not
supported for aggregate functions"
and
"variadic argument isn't last function's argument" -> "variadic
parameter must be the last parameter to the function"
Those are just suggested wordings.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
