Re: BUG #3110: Online Backup introduces Duplicate OIDs - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: BUG #3110: Online Backup introduces Duplicate OIDs
Date
Msg-id 1212679879.19964.131.camel@ebony.site
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #3110: Online Backup introduces Duplicate OIDs  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: BUG #3110: Online Backup introduces Duplicate OIDs  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-bugs
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 10:59 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > I would like to introduce a WARNING message into recovery to show that a
> > backup_label was expected, yet was not present. This is normal in some
> > use cases of recovery, but we need to be able to tell those situations
> > apart. Any objections?
>
> Given that the case would sometimes be expected, I think a warning would
> just add confusion.  If we could distinguish the cases and make it a
> hard ERROR to be lacking the label when it's needed, then maybe, but I'm
> not sure how.

OK, understood.

How about we do this:

* Add some more docs

* Put a specific warning about the need for a backup_label file into the
next release notes for 8.x.x releases. "Important change to docs for
recovery:..."

* In the release note comments, add that in a future release we will add
a parameter to recovery.conf "require_backup_label" which defaults to
"true".

* Repeat this warning in the next release notes also

* On the one after that we actually make the change. Once we add this,
if the backup_label is missing then we throw an ERROR.

--
 Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com
 PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #3110: Online Backup introduces Duplicate OIDs
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #3110: Online Backup introduces Duplicate OIDs