Re: FW: Re: FW: Re: Shouldn;t this trigger be called? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Adrian Klaver
Subject Re: FW: Re: FW: Re: Shouldn;t this trigger be called?
Date
Msg-id 11b4428d-8740-07f4-a053-37f0bb0cd2fb@aklaver.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: FW: Re: FW: Re: Shouldn;t this trigger be called?  (stan <stanb@panix.com>)
List pgsql-general
On 9/15/19 6:04 PM, stan wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 12:27:14PM -0700, Adrian Klaver wrote:
>> On 9/15/19 10:46 AM, stan wrote:
>>> Forgot to cc the list again. Have to look at settings in mutt.
>>>
>>>>>>

>> What validity check?
>>
> 
> The check to see if it is the type enum.
> 

This would get solved a lot quicker if full information was provided:

1) Schema of the table.
    Including associated triggers

2) The actual check code.


-- 
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: FW: Re: FW: Re: Shouldn;t this trigger be called?
Next
From: Achilleas Mantzios
Date:
Subject: Re: pgbouncer with ldap