> > > Basically, time travel was getting in the way of more
> requested features
> >
> > Do you mean way back when it was removed? How was it
> getting in the way?
>
> Yes. Every tuple had this time-thing that had to be tested. Vadim
> wanted to revove it to clear up the coding, and we all agreed.
Was it not only the mapping between a t_xmin and a wallclock time
that was removed ? Thus you can still see the history of a row, but
not the corresponding times ?
Andreas
