Re: Heavy write activity on first vacuum of fresh TOAST data - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Heavy write activity on first vacuum of fresh TOAST data
Date
Msg-id 1197582010.4255.1912.camel@ebony.site
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Heavy write activity on first vacuum of fresh TOAST data  ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>)
Responses Re: Heavy write activity on first vacuum of fresh TOAST data  ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>)
Re: Heavy write activity on first vacuum of fresh TOAST data  (Russell Smith <mr-russ@pws.com.au>)
Re: Heavy write activity on first vacuum of fresh TOAST data  ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>)
List pgsql-performance
On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 15:19 -0600, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 12:12 PM, in message
> <1197569564.4255.1855.camel@ebony.site>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 11:46 -0600, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> >> If the hint bit changes are written to the WAL ...
> >
> > They're not.
>
> So one would expect a write-intensive initial vacuum after a
> PITR-style recovery?

Very perceptive. I was just thinking about that myself. An interesting
issue when running with full_page_writes off.

> What impact would lack of the hint bits have until a vacuum?

Vacuum isn't important here. Its the first idiot to read the data that
gets hit.

--
  Simon Riggs
  2ndQuadrant  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: Heavy write activity on first vacuum of fresh TOAST data
Next
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: Heavy write activity on first vacuum of fresh TOAST data