Re: BUG #12782: Some abnormal observation about the to_date() function in greenplum database - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: BUG #12782: Some abnormal observation about the to_date() function in greenplum database
Date
Msg-id 11970.1424278497@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to BUG #12782: Some abnormal observation about the to_date() function in greenplum database  (patl659in@rediffmail.com)
List pgsql-bugs
patl659in@rediffmail.com writes:
> Grennplum 4.3 64 bit

You would really need to take this up with Greenplum.  Most of these test
cases would fail outright in any community-supported Postgres version,
because to_date takes type text not date.  I suspect they are not actually
bugs but user error ... but in any case, pgsql-bugs is not Greenplum's
support department.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #12779: pg_dump -Fd doesn't care about -Z
Next
From: gibheer@zero-knowledge.org
Date:
Subject: BUG #12784: pg_relation_size has problems with case in index name