Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Neil Conway
Subject Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Date
Msg-id 1188318866.15185.10.camel@goldbach
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)  (Robert Bernier <robert.bernier5@sympatico.ca>)
Responses Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)  (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>)
Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)  (Ron Mayer <rm_pg@cheapcomplexdevices.com>)
List pgsql-advocacy
On Tue, 2007-28-08 at 11:15 -0400, Robert Bernier wrote:
> How many people feel we should adopt 'postgres' for the '9.0'
> reference documentation (let's leave the issue of the tons of work
> involved out of the debate for the moment)?

+1 -- I think we should make the name change, but I don't have any
strong preference about when we ought to do it (now, for 8.3, for 8.4,
etc -- I wouldn't necessarily want to wait for some far-off theoretical
9.0 release).

-Neil



pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: "Jonah H. Harris"
Date:
Subject: Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: mysql proxy