Re: boolean <=> text explicit casts - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Neil Conway
Subject Re: boolean <=> text explicit casts
Date
Msg-id 1180554017.6648.98.camel@goldbach
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: boolean <=> text explicit casts  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: boolean <=> text explicit casts
List pgsql-patches
On Wed, 2007-30-05 at 21:23 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I'm not sure what your rationale was for creating lower-case words
> instead of upper case, except for it looks nicer.  Is there a technical
> reason?

There's no real technical reason: the standard says upper-case, but PG's
general philosophy of case folding would suggest folding to lower-case.
If we were compliant with the spec's case folding requirements then
emitting uppercase would be the clear choice, but since we aren't, I
don't have strong feelings either way.

-Neil



pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Seq scans status update
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: COPY-able csv log outputs