Obsolete references to GBorg in documentation - Mailing list pgsql-docs

From Tom Lane
Subject Obsolete references to GBorg in documentation
Date
Msg-id 11780.1195005726@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Obsolete references to GBorg in documentation  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Re: Obsolete references to GBorg in documentation  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Re: Obsolete references to GBorg in documentation  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Re: Obsolete references to GBorg in documentation  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-docs
Now that gborg.postgresql.org is officially dead, seems like it'd be a
good idea to update all the references to it that are in the FAQ.

There are also some references in older sections of release.sgml,
which I'm of two minds about updating --- those are historically
correct, but as links they're not of so much use anymore.
Thoughts?

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-docs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Placement of contrib modules in SGML documentation
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Obsolete references to GBorg in documentation