On Wed, 2007-01-24 at 18:38 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > In any case, I agree with Andrew that it would be pretty dumb to reject > a funded, already written patch. Well, there are two separate issues: should we include tsearch2 in core, and what syntax should it use? Changing the syntax would not require rejecting the entire patch. > If people had a problem with integrating tsearch2 in core they should > have said so much earlier. Peter, Tom and others raised essentially identical objections when this design was initially proposed. For example: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-11/msg00392.php http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-11/msg00405.php http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-11/msg00437.php http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-11/msg00397.php Was a consensus reached in that thread? (I didn't see one, but perhaps I've overlooked a mail.) -Neil
pgsql-hackers by date:
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных