Re: High update activity, PostgreSQL vs BigDBMS - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: High update activity, PostgreSQL vs BigDBMS
Date
Msg-id 1168225799.724.0.camel@localhost.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: High update activity, PostgreSQL vs BigDBMS  ("Adam Rich" <adam.r@sbcglobal.net>)
Responses Re: High update activity, PostgreSQL vs BigDBMS
List pgsql-performance
On Sun, 2007-01-07 at 20:26 -0600, Adam Rich wrote:
> I'm using 8.2 and using order by & limit is still faster than MAX()
> even though MAX() now seems to rewrite to an almost identical plan
> internally.


Gonna need you to back that up :) Can we get an explain analyze?


> Count(*) still seems to use a full table scan rather than an index scan.
>

There is a TODO out there to help this. Don't know if it will get done.

Joshua D. Drake

--

      === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
             http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate




pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: High update activity, PostgreSQL vs BigDBMS
Next
From: Guy Rouillier
Date:
Subject: Re: High update activity, PostgreSQL vs BigDBMS