Re: [rfc] new CREATE FUNCTION (and more) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [rfc] new CREATE FUNCTION (and more)
Date
Msg-id 11660.974436048@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to [rfc] new CREATE FUNCTION (and more)  (Marko Kreen <marko@l-t.ee>)
List pgsql-hackers
Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au> writes:
> Not at all. The call is, as you point out, defining the protocl for
> enquiry. Nothing more. With 7.1, the process above is sufficient. There is
> no need to call *in this version* because pg_fmgr_api_version returns
> enough information when combined with the existence of a well-defined entry
> point. Future versions would need to call the entry point, I would expect.

Well, I was planning to go ahead and call the entry point anyway, just
so that it could tell me "it's an old-style function" if it wanted to.
Not sure that'll ever happen in practice, but that case ought to work
IMHO.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: The Hermit Hacker
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [GENERAL] PHPBuilder article -- Postgres vs MySQL
Next
From: Malek Shabou
Date:
Subject: problem with foreign keys