Re: The relative stability of different procedural - Mailing list pgsql-general

From BigSmoke
Subject Re: The relative stability of different procedural
Date
Msg-id 1165530943.241286.304310@j44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: The relative stability of different procedural  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Dec 7, 11:11 pm, j...@commandprompt.com ("Joshua D. Drake") wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-12-07 at 14:02 -0800, BigSmoke wrote:
> > I'm facing a particular task for which I need any procedural language
> > but PL/PgSQL. I can't use PL/PgSQL because it doesn't allow me to use
> > local variables such as new and old from a dynamic command.PLPerl. And I say this as someone who doesn't even like
Perl.
>
> Joshua D. Drake

Thanks heaps! That's the answer I was looking for.

  - Rowan


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "BigSmoke"
Date:
Subject: Re: The relative stability of different procedural languages
Next
From: Tony Caduto
Date:
Subject: Re: The relative stability of different procedural languages