Re: The relative stability of different procedural - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: The relative stability of different procedural
Date
Msg-id 1165529504.12459.56.camel@localhost.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to The relative stability of different procedural languages  ("BigSmoke" <bigsmoke@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: The relative stability of different procedural  ("BigSmoke" <bigsmoke@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Thu, 2006-12-07 at 14:02 -0800, BigSmoke wrote:
> I'm facing a particular task for which I need any procedural language
> but PL/PgSQL. I can't use PL/PgSQL because it doesn't allow me to use
> local variables such as new and old from a dynamic command.

PLPerl. And I say this as someone who doesn't even like Perl.

Joshua D. Drake


--

      === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
             http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate




pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Merlin Moncure"
Date:
Subject: Re: The relative stability of different procedural languages
Next
From: "Angva"
Date:
Subject: loading data, creating indexes, clustering, vacuum...