> > Well, we mostly do random reads (seek) all the time anyway, so is this
> > really a concern?
> >
> > Are you using NTFS or FAT? You didn't answer that question.
> >
>
> If it's FAT then you deserve what you get.
I am investigating this for the wider community. I do not, use
PostgreSQL Win32 for anything but testing, but guess what -- our silent
majority does. I have a customer with 5000 Win32 installations and they
are not the only ones with those types of deployments.
I am trying to get as much information as possible so that:
1. We can update the documentation to correctly reflect issues with
Win32.
2. We can hopefully become the dominant database on Win32.
>
> If you really need this, a Slony setup would probably work well.
The idea of Slony with Windows is a bit terryfying considering the
target Admin audience and the performance hit one would take.
> Shut down
> replica, defrag, start up replica, wait for sync completion, switchover
> and repeat. The new Slony release is said to support Windows.
O.k., doesn't this seem like killing a squirrel with a 50mm tank gun?
The fact that this was suggested as anything but a last resort isn't to
inspiring.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> cheers
>
> andrew
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
