Ühel kenal päeval, K, 2006-08-23 kell 13:09, kirjutas Markus
Schiltknecht:
> Hannu Krosing wrote:
> > But any sync _replication_ system will have severe impact on
> > performance. My guess is that for a full sync replication, going from 1
> > server to 2 will actually lower performance andsome small gains would be
> > possible only starting from 3rd server.
>
> Only testing will show concrete results, but for sure such a general
> answer does not make much sense. It all depends very much on the type of
> your load. Especially the read/write ratio is very important.
True.
But if you have very few writes, then there seems no reason to do sync
anyway.
> Another important factor is the amount of conflicting transactions.
That too, but just the need to do *any* locking on all nodes will
significantly slow down sync replication
> > My quess is based on using standard 100Gb ethernet. It may be possible
> > to do better on some more advanced interconnects like myrinet.
>
> 100Gb ethernet already sounds very advanced... ;-)
Yeah, I meant some mix of 100Mb and 1Gb ;)
> Regards
>
> Markus
>
--
----------------
Hannu Krosing
Database Architect
Skype Technologies OÜ
Akadeemia tee 21 F, Tallinn, 12618, Estonia
Skype me: callto:hkrosing
Get Skype for free: http://www.skype.com
