> On 29 Oct 2025, at 10:41, Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> wrote:
> On 22.10.25 10:59, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>>> On 1 Sep 2025, at 07:27, Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> wrote:
>>> I suggest that instead of adding the context to the Port structure, make a separate context struct for this
purpose,for example:
>> Fair enough, done in the attached.
>
> This looks good to me. (I would not have the CallbackErr typedef, since that additional abstraction doesn't buy
anything. But it's a small difference.)
Thanks, I removed the typedef and went ahead with this patch.
>> (sidenote; if our thread
>> local store code will use TLS then be-secure-openssl.c will be challenging to
>> read =)).
>
> Yes, let's rename it to SSL to avoid this. ;-)
Touché! =)
--
Daniel Gustafsson
