On 22.10.25 10:59, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> On 1 Sep 2025, at 07:27, Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> wrote:
>
>> I suggest that instead of adding the context to the Port structure, make a separate context struct for this purpose,
forexample:
>
> Fair enough, done in the attached.
This looks good to me. (I would not have the CallbackErr typedef, since
that additional abstraction doesn't buy anything. But it's a small
difference.)
>> This seems like an extremely inconvenient solution, as can be seen by the amount of changes your patch introduces.
Wecould just make errbuf thread-local and be done, without having to change the API. (This is how glibc's strerror()
worksinternally.)
>
> I assume you mean simply leaving it be for now awaiting more thread primitives
> to be added to fully support thread local storage?
Yes
> (sidenote; if our thread
> local store code will use TLS then be-secure-openssl.c will be challenging to
> read =)).
Yes, let's rename it to SSL to avoid this. ;-)
