On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 17:50 +0800, Qingqing Zhou wrote:
> "Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote
> >
> > Can we do the same for the file descriptors in fd.c?
> >
> > Very often the total number of file descriptors is much less than the
> > maximum, so it would make sense to only maintain the LRU when we are
> > using more than 50%-75% of the maximum.
> >
>
> I am not against doing it but AFAIR the LRU file operations is
> (1) not frequent;
The LRU moves each time we do FileRead or FileWrite, not just on
open/close operations.
> (2) the cost is only several CPU circles if we do not run out of
> fds;
So its not really likely ever to show high on oprofile, but if its an
avoidable operation that isn't always needed, why do it?
> (3) the LRU lseek/close/open big cost is still not avoidable when we
> really run out of fds.
Agreed, but the limit is reasonably high, so this isn't anywhere near
being something we always hit otherwise we would be more worried.
-- Simon Riggs EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
