Ühel kenal päeval, N, 2006-06-08 kell 12:09, kirjutas Tom Lane:
> Hannu Krosing <hannu@skype.net> writes:
> > If the aim is to *only* avoid transaction wraparound, then maybe we
> > could introduce VACUUM FREEZE ONLY; which never removes any old tuples,
> > but instead just marks them by setting xmin=xmax for them, in addition
> > to its freezing of live-and-visible-to-all tuples.
>
> > This would avoid touching indexes at all and may well be what is desired
> > for tables with only very little updates/deletes.
>
> Seems like useless complexity. If there are so few dead tuples that you
> can afford to not reclaim them, then there are so few that reclaiming
> them isn't really going to cost much either ...
It will cost 1 full scan per index, which can be quite a lot of disk
read traffic, if indexes are not used, say when most access is local to
some hotspot.
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
--
----------------
Hannu Krosing
Database Architect
Skype Technologies OÜ
Akadeemia tee 21 F, Tallinn, 12618, Estonia
Skype me: callto:hkrosing
Get Skype for free: http://www.skype.com
