On Mon, 2006-05-22 at 23:55, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> BTW, there's a bug/issue with CLUSTER that makes it not entirely
> transaction safe.
For God's sake, don't fix that one ! I rely on it... now seriously,
until there's a way to tell the DB that an exclusive lock is enough to
vacuum all dead rows, even if they would be visible by other
transactions, CLUSTER is the only thing I can use to circumvent the long
running transaction syndrome.
Cheers,
Csaba.
