Re: A question about Vacuum analyze - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Ragnar
Subject Re: A question about Vacuum analyze
Date
Msg-id 1140102303.32324.44.camel@localhost.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to A question about Vacuum analyze  (Emi Lu <emilu@encs.concordia.ca>)
List pgsql-general
On fim, 2006-02-16 at 09:12 -0500, Emi Lu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We have a daily cronjob and in the cronjob we do:
>   1.  truncate one table A
>   2.  insert into table A
>   3.  do comparision table A and table B and update table B accordingly
>
> The doc says "VACUUM ANALYZE command for the affected table. This will
> update the system catalogs with the results of all recent changes, and
> allow the PostgreSQL query planner to make better choices in planning
> queries".
> So, I believe after insertion at step 2, comparision will be speed up if
> we do a "vacuum analyze" right?

after only truncate and inserts , vacuum is not needed,
but ANALYZE is good.

> In another way, whenever we "delete/truncate and then insert" data into
> a table, it is better to "vacuum anaylze"?

after deleting or updating a significant percentage of
rows, VACUUM can be called for, but usually VACUUM is
done as part of regular maintenance, or by autovacuum.

gnari



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "John Zubac"
Date:
Subject: Re: Oracle tried to buy MySQL
Next
From: Reid Thompson
Date:
Subject: Re: Oracle tried to buy MySQL