Re: more C99 cleanup - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: more C99 cleanup
Date
Msg-id 1136414.1764050035@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: more C99 cleanup  (Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> writes:
> On 21.11.25 17:10, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Ah, there are several.  It's not totally obvious perhaps where the
>> cause is.  I'll attach the diffs just for the archives' sake.

> For clarification, does what you are showing mean that the regression 
> tests have enough coverage of the hypot() edge cases?

We are definitely covering it.  It's just that the present tests
fail in a way that wouldn't scream "hypot is broken" to some
future hacker dealing with such a failure.  Not sure if that's
worth worrying about; but I'd lean to not worrying unless you
commit and we see such failures in the buildfarm.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: headerscheck ccache support
Next
From: Maxim Orlov
Date:
Subject: Re: Add 64-bit XIDs into PostgreSQL 15