Re: Draft back-branch release notes are up - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Draft back-branch release notes are up
Date
Msg-id 113579.1620419138@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Draft back-branch release notes are up  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
> I suppose you're aware of this, so I just want to get it on record that
> this entry

> +<!--
> +Author: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
> +Branch: master [25936fd46] 2021-02-27 18:09:15 -0300
> +Branch: REL_13_STABLE [2688852a4] 2021-02-27 18:09:15 -0300
> +Branch: REL_12_STABLE [262eb990c] 2021-02-27 18:09:15 -0300
> +Branch: REL_11_STABLE [d1c6edd31] 2021-02-27 18:09:15 -0300
> +-->
> +     <para>
> +      Fix use-after-free bug in saving tuples for <literal>AFTER</literal>
> +      triggers (Amit Langote)
> +     </para>

> only goes back to 12; the commit to 11 was just to add the test case.
> This is obvious if you look at the commit, but if you just look at the
> release note entry, that detail might be missed.

Good point.  I'll make sure this doesn't get into the v11 notes
(which I probably would have done if you didn't point it out,
so thanks).

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Erik Rijkers
Date:
Subject: JSON doc example (matchiness)
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Anti-critical-section assertion failure in mcxt.c reached by walsender