On Wed, 2005-05-04 at 21:06, Vlad wrote:
> the number one aim at the moment is to have "always-up-to-date" copy
> of our main DB with minial performance impact on replication
Have you considered point in time recovery as implemented in 8.0?
While it does require some small amount of work to bring the secondary
server up to date, it's not that much, and it gives you very up to date
recoverability.
